Zapier Is Filed Under Video. So Is Suno.
Sixty-plus logos in six labelled bands: VIDEO, DESIGN, WRITING, CHATBOT, MARKETING, PRODUCTIVITY. It looks like an atlas. The caption promises an entire AI ecosystem in one place and over a hundred hours saved.
Start at the top band and read the names under the icons.
Under VIDEO: Simplified, Veed, Descript, 11 Labs, Zapier, PixelMe, Suno, Fliki, Shuffll, Invideo, HeyGen, Lucidpic, Durable.
Zapier is an automation platform – it connects apps to each other. Suno makes music. PixelMe is a URL shortener that embeds retargeting pixels into your links. Lucidpic generates royalty-free stock photos of people who do not exist. Durable builds websites. Not one of those five can produce a video.
That is five of thirteen in the first band alone, and the pattern holds all the way down. The bands are not categories. They are shelves – and a shelf tells you where something was put, not what it is.
This is not a hit piece. There is a real, useful list of names here, and some of these tools are genuinely good. But there is a right way and a wrong way to use a picture like this, and the difference turns on one question: is this a map, or is it a bag?
The card this post is about
Watch the original reel: “Exploring the top 60+ AI tools”
Six bands of icons, footed “Tools and features change fast. Check each official site before you use it.” The tables below reproduce the bands as printed.
A map tells you where to look. A bag tells you what exists.
Those are two different objects and they fail you in two different ways, so it is worth being precise about which one you are holding.
| A MAP | A BAG | |
|---|---|---|
| What the label means | A promise. Everything under VIDEO makes video | A shelf. Everything under VIDEO was put under VIDEO |
| How you use it | Go to the band for your job, choose from inside it | Scan for names you have not heard of, then look each one up |
| What it saves you | Deciding. The sorting has been done for you | Discovery. You now know these things exist |
| How it fails | Rarely – but when a label is wrong you trust it anyway | Only if you treat it as a map |
| What it costs to be wrong | An afternoon chasing a tool that cannot do the job | Thirty seconds reading a homepage |
| Which is this card? | — | A bag. A good one, with about sixty names in it |
Read as a bag, this card is worth your time. There are names in there most people have not met – Shuffll, Respell, Lucidpic, Sortext – and discovery is a real service. Read as a map, it will send you to the VIDEO shelf for a video tool and hand you a URL shortener.
The giveaway is the format itself. Every icon is the same size, every band is the same width, and there is not one word of description anywhere on the card. A grid of identical icons can only say these are all the same kind of thing. The single word above each grid is then carrying the entire burden of meaning for up to fifteen products, which is more than one word can do.
The six bands, and what is actually in them
Column 2 is the card’s own content, read off the reel. Column 3 is ours. We have only flagged entries we could confirm, and the source video is low resolution – a few of the smaller names were not legible enough for us to check, so we left them alone rather than guess.
| Band (card’s label) | The icons, as printed | Our note (not on the card) – checked 8 October 2026 |
|---|---|---|
| VIDEO 13 icons |
Simplified, Veed, Descript, 11 Labs, Zapier, PixelMe, Suno, Fliki, Shuffll, Invideo, HeyGen, Lucidpic, Durable | Zapier automates apps · Suno makes music · PixelMe is a URL shortener with retargeting · Lucidpic makes AI stock photos of people · Durable builds websites. 11 Labs is voice, not video |
| DESIGN 15 icons |
Canva, Namecheap, Playground, Midjourney, Brandmark, Safurai, SeaArt, Ideogram, MakeLogo, Lognai, Leonardo, Looka, Dribbble, Framer, Designs AI | Namecheap sells domain names · Safurai is a code assistant · Dribbble is a designers’ portfolio community, not an AI tool at all. Framer builds sites |
| WRITING 13 icons |
ChatGPT, Notion AI, MarsAI, Jenni AI, Rytr, Jenni, Text FX, Claude, Monica, Codeium, Google Gemini, Hix, Grammarly | Codeium completes code · Jenni AI and Jenni appear to be the same product, listed twice · ChatGPT, Claude and Gemini sit here while Perplexity sits two bands down |
| CHATBOT 12 icons |
Gleen, Chatbot, Blogseo, Trowllon, LongShot, Respell, Chatbase, Taskade, Mindgroup, Alli AI, Perplexity, COZE | Blogseo, LongShot and Alli AI are SEO and content-writing tools · Perplexity is a search engine · Taskade is a task manager. Genuine chatbot builders here: perhaps five |
| MARKETING 7 icons |
Seona AI, QuillBot, GitMind, Plai, Madgicx, AdCopy, Jasper | QuillBot paraphrases text · GitMind is mind-mapping. The smallest band, and still two of seven are misfiled |
| PRODUCTIVITY 12 icons |
Semrush, Tldv, Leap, Sortext, Gephify, Pebblely, Pencil, Tome, Chatsimple, Bright Eye, AdCreative, 10Web | Semrush is SEO · Pebblely makes product-photo backdrops · Pencil and AdCreative make ad creatives · 10Web is WordPress hosting. Four of these belong under MARKETING |
Why this happens, and why it is not carelessness
Count roughly and about twenty of the seventy-two icons are under a label that does not describe them. That is not someone being sloppy twenty times. It is a format doing what formats do.
A grid of logos has exactly one unit of meaning available: the band you are in. There is no room for a sentence, no room for a qualifier, no room for “this one is really a marketing tool but creators use it for thumbnails”. So every tool has to be assigned to exactly one of six words, and six words cannot cover sixty products. AdCreative is marketing and design and productivity depending on who you are. The grid makes you pick one, and then the one you picked becomes a promise you never meant to make.
The proof that the layout is driving it is in the shape. Every band is nine icons across the top, then a shorter second row. Tools are being placed into a grid that needed filling, in a band that had room.
And here is the thing worth saying plainly: the same brand has already solved this. Another card from the same feed lists sixty AI tools across ten parts, six per part, with a one-line description under every single logo – “Restore old, blurry photos”, “Run it on your own machine”, “Editing on your phone”. We wrote about it in ten slots, six candidates each, and those descriptions are the entire difference. Same number of tools, same format family, one of them usable as a map and the other usable only as a bag.
Six words per tool is all it takes. That is the whole fix.
How to actually use a bag of sixty names
If you are going to get value out of this card – and you can – here is the sequence. It takes about ten minutes and it does not involve trying anything.
| Step | What you do | Why this order | Time |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Ignore the bands | Read all seventy-two names as one flat list. Do not navigate by label | The labels are the part that is wrong. Using them first is how you waste the afternoon | 1 minute |
| 2. Mark only what you do not recognise | Circle the unfamiliar names. For most people that is fifteen to twenty-five of them | The ones you know need no research. Discovery is the only thing a bag is good for | 2 minutes |
| 3. Open each one and read the headline | Homepage, first sentence, nothing else. Write six words next to the name | You are building the description column the card does not have. Six words is enough to file it correctly | 5 minutes |
| 4. Keep two. Throw the rest away | Two names that map to a job you actually did badly last week | A bag of sixty with twenty new names in it is still not a plan. Two is a plan | 2 minutes |
Step three is the whole post in one line. You are doing by hand, in five minutes, the thing the card’s format could not do: attaching a description to a name. Once each tool has six words next to it, the misfiling stops mattering entirely – you have your own labels, and yours are correct.
Step four is the one people skip. A bag with twenty new names in it feels like progress and is not. We went through the arithmetic of this on a different sixty-tool card: you do not have sixty jobs, you have a handful, and the card’s own instruction on that one was pick one and use it today.
Four honest caveats
The footer is the best sentence on the card, again. “Tools and features change fast. Check each official site before you use it.” That is exactly right, and it is also a quiet admission that the grid cannot tell you what a tool does – which is why you have to go to the site. Follow the footer and the misfiling never hurts you.
Two entries are not AI tools. Namecheap sells domain names. Dribbble is a portfolio and hiring community for designers. Both are useful things to know about if you are building a brand, and neither belongs in a list whose premise is AI. That is worth noticing not to score a point but because it tells you how the list was assembled – by topic adjacency, not by function.
We could not verify everything, and one name raised a flag. The source is a low-resolution reel and several of the smaller labels were not legible enough to check, so we left them unmarked rather than guess. Separately: when we looked up Safurai, some of the results were asking whether it had shut down. We did not confirm that either way – which is precisely the point. We have watched a card recommend a product that had closed over a year earlier, and the only reliable test is the cheapest one: open the link.
This post is dated. Everything in our column was checked on 8 October 2026. Tools get repositioned, acquired and renamed, and a tool that is misfiled today may be correctly filed next year because it changed, not because the card did.
The one-line version
Zapier is filed under video. So is Suno, a URL shortener, an AI stock-photo site and a website builder. The six words along the top of this card are shelves, not promises – and once you know that, the card becomes useful instead of misleading.
So read it as a bag. Scan for names you do not know, open each one, write six words next to it, and keep two. The six words you write yourself are worth more than the category somebody else assigned, because yours describe what the tool does for your work.
That is the move we keep arriving at from every direction – re-sorting a list on an axis the author did not use, asking which job rather than which year, adding the ownership column the card had no room for. The value is never in the picture. It is in the column you add.
Learning a lot does not make anyone good. Doing a lot does. Sixty logos is learning. Two tools used on Tuesday is doing.
If you want to be held to that, we run a free challenge at BANI Academy. There is no barrier to entry – you commit a small fee that is refunded when you finish, and the only requirement is that you actually do the work for the length of the challenge. Nobody has ever been held back by owning fewer than sixty tools.
Which two did you keep? Tell us in the comments under the original reel – and say what six words you wrote next to them.
More on building a channel for a global audience at mmoyoutube.com.



